OK now all though she is making valid points here. and it was history and is important to figure out wtf happened at that time. and what he coulda shoulda woulda. the fact that he's there for a case that has NOTHING to do with this incident that happened 18 fuckin years ago doesnt make sense to me on why her 30- 45 minute case with him consists of 16 minutes of her talkin about the 1991 incident. i just dont understand lmao
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment